by John Grooms
Knee-jerk reactions are not the exclusive property of any political persuasion or group. That was obvious yesterday, as a friend and I met for lunch. At one point, my friend left the table, leaving me to, eavesd ... um, accidentally overhear a youngish, white couple at the next table, who were chatting about the Charlotte Housing Authoritys plan to redevelop 17 acres in Dilworth. The guy at the next table said to the woman, Dyou see the Observer article about people in Dilworth fighting against a new affordable housing plan there? Yeah, I saw it, answered the woman, typical. Theyre as bad as those jerks in Ballantyne. I know, right? replied the guy, Hypocrites. When its in their own neighborhood, theyre just as racist and stupid.
You dont expect detailed, reasoned arguments over lunch any more than that couple expected others to be listening to them but the pairs little exchange was blatant knee-jerking at its finest. The Dilwort/CHA situation could hardly be more different than the Ballantyne fracas, where CHA canceled a sloppily arranged low-income housing plan after a mob of entitled golfers and friends descended on a public meeting to howl about their supposedly threatened property values.
By contrast, many people in Dilworth actually wish the CHA would build more affordable housing on the 17 acres in question, since the neighborhood has been supportive of the presence of over 300 subsidized apartments at the site. Instead, CHA wants to develop the property into primarily market-rate housing (which, in Dilworth, means expensive), as well as stores and offices. Profits would go toward building more affordable housing elsewhere (although CHA says it could, in the end, simply sell the 17 acres).
Problems arose over the height of two proposed buildings; possible noise and disrupted traffic during construction; and questions about light pollution, flooding control, and garbage. Unlike what happened during the Ballantyne mess, Dilworth residents worked with CHA and hashed out compromises. Building heights and overall size were shrunk, more trees will be saved, and agreements were reached on all but the flood control issue. Not everyone in Dilworth is happy, and some, including former Councilwoman Sara Spencer, still think CHA should build more affordable housing on the site instead of redeveloping it. But the conflict was on how to best use the property, and it was nothing like the Ballantyne God help us, the poor are coming! situation. Knee-jerk progressives, please take note.