I have two complaints: one with the world and one with you. My problem with the world is that it seems to think it is possible to embrace the rights of sex workers and still stigmatize the men who employ them. I am in a happy monogamish marriage, and I enjoy a very good, vanilla-but-bordering-on-tantric sex life with my wife. Early on, when we discussed how open our marriage should be, we decided it would be all right for me to see escorts several times a year. This gives me some sexual variety and keeps her from feeling threatened by my becoming emotionally involved with a third party. She is very mono and has no interest in going outside the marriage for sex. My quarrel with you has to do with your oft-repeated advice that people should break things off with partners who don't perform oral sex. My wife doesn't like to give head — and I really don't like getting it from her, since she doesn't like doing it. It is, however, one of the things on my list for my quarterly pro session. So I go down on her, she doesn't go down on me, and I see escorts who do. And...
It Works For Us
In regards to your first complaint, IWFU, there are sex workers out there fighting for their rights and fighting the stigma against sex work — along with fighting prohibition, the Nordic Model, and SESTA (google it) — but you don't see the men who employ them stepping up and joining the fight.
"[It's time for] all of you clients out there [to] get off your duffs and fight," as sex worker and sex-worker-rights advocate Maggie McNeill wrote on her blog. "Regular clients outnumber full-time whores by at least 60 to 1. Gentlemen, I suggest you rethink your current silence, unless you want to be the next one with your name and picture splashed across newspapers, TV screens, and websites."
In regards to your second complaint, IWFU, it is true that I've said — on one or two occasions — that oral comes standard and any model that arrives without oral should be returned to the lot. I've also said that you can't be in an LTR without paying the price of admission, and I've said that a lot more often. If not getting oral at home is the price of admission you're willing to pay to be with your wife, and if allowing you to get oral elsewhere is the price of admission she's willing to pay to be with you, then Godspeed, IWFU, and tip the sex workers you patronize and speak up to fight the stigma against doing sex work and hiring sex workers.
I am a 38-year-old gay man with a serious problem. My boyfriend of five years has developed a strange fascination. We've always watched porn together, but now he has been looking at straight porn and even lesbian porn (!!!) more and more often. More than once he has expressed an interest in having a MMF threesome — and he's a self-proclaimed gold-star gay! This week, I discovered he had hidden a Fleshlight from me. I could tell he had used it. What is going on with him? On the other hand, we still have sex pretty frequently. He really gets off when I call his ass a "pussy," which I'll do to turn him on, but I find it pretty weird. He also tells me he gets off on the thought of the two of us fucking a woman together. This really seems bizarre! Could my beautiful bottom boy be turning bi? If he is, I don't know how we can handle it.
Guy Alarmed, Yeah, By Younger Boyfriend's Interest
Turning bi? Unlikely. Always was bi and only just realized it? Likelier.
Always was bi but identified as gay because (1) he prefers men as romantic partners and (2) the biphobia he encountered in gay male spaces/bedrooms/buttholes convinced him to stay closeted but he doesn't want to live a lie anymore and he's done hiding from the man he loves but instead of using his words and coming out to you like a grown-up, GAYBYBI, your boyfriend is letting you know he's bi with his porn choices and a big push to make a MMF threesome sound like a sexy adventure you would both enjoy? Likeliest.
As for how to handle it, GAYBYBI, you'll have to use your words: Ask your boyfriend if he's bi. (Spoiler: He's bi, bicurious, or so homoflexible he could tour with Cirque du Soleil.) If you're not interested in having sex with women, tell him so. If being with you means he can never have sex with a woman, tell him so. And if you would never knowingly date a bi guy, tell him he deserves better.
A relationship question that doesn't involve sex: Occasionally when two people live together, they bump into each other or one may get in the way of the other. Is it reasonable to be put off if rather than simply hearing "Excuse me" when you are inadvertently in someone's way, the person trying to gain access says, "Do you have to stand there?"
Just Seems Rude
People who are courteous to strangers ("Excuse me, can I squeeze past you?") and contemptuous with intimate partners ("Do you have to stand there, you fucking dumbass?") don't value their partners and don't deserve intimacy. People who are assholes to everyone don't deserve intimacy either, of course, but they get points for being consistent.
I recently posted an online ad for a jack-off buddy. I got a response from a man who turned out to be a gorgeous, young Sri Lankan dude with a huge, beautiful uncut cock. Anyway, I was really looking forward to him jacking me off and vice versa. But when I arrived, he said he was only interested in me giving him a massage and then a handjob. Apparently, he's a straight guy who wanted to experiment with men in a very limited way. Like I said, SUPER HOT, so I happily obliged. But after he came, I was really aching for release myself. But as I stated earlier, he made it clear he did not want to reciprocate. After we were finished, he indicated that he might hit me up again. Do you think I should continue with the massage and "happy ending" in hopes he will someday feel comfortable enough to reciprocate? Or should I just go ahead and find myself another jack-off buddy?
Craving Uncut Masculine Sri Lankan
Another jack-off buddy? No, no. Additional jack-off buddy.
I recently spent a wonderful weekend with a young woman from out of town who identifies as queer and poly. Being the curious guy I am, I had her explain what these things meant to her. She went on to say that she is considering changing from poly to nonmonogamous. I find this confusing. I'm certainly nonmonogamous, but I've never thought of myself as poly. What is the difference?
Confused Over Lines Inside Names
I would describe the difference as googleable, COLIN. But since you asked: A nonmonogamous person has sex with their partner and others; a poly person has or is open to having committed and concurrent romantic relationships. For one example: An ethically nonmonogamous woman fucks the boyfriend/husband she loves and other guys she doesn't; a poly woman has two (or more) guys she both loves and fucks.